I can’t come up with a fresh intro, so here is some context. I love the Power Rangers shows! Campy, but fun; formulaic, but entertaining; they serve as very fond childhood memories of mine (S.P.D. and Samurai were my favorite generations). When they announced a film adaptation, I had the usual Internet response: insta-rage. Not only did they hire the director of Project Almanac (loads of potential, crappy execution), but the script went through multiple writers before being turned into a 2 hour screenplay that is supposed to set up a universe which rivals that of Marvel. Well, if Lionsgate wants to milk 6 sequels out of this movie, it better grab the audience’s attention with likable characters, a clever plot, and jaw-dropping visuals. Or they could just rip-off Chronicle.
Power Rangers is directed by Dean Israelite and written by: John Gatins, Matt Sazama, Burk Sharpless, Michele Mulroney, and Kieran Mulroney. Stars-Dacre Montgomery, Naomi Scott, RJ Cyler, Ludi Lin, Becky G., Elizabeth Banks, Bill Hader, and Bryan Cranston. Premise-A group of high school students come across some otherworldly technology and after an accident, come away from it with superpowers. As per the ususal, now they must save the world.
I should probably preface this review by saying that I don’t recall all the lore and characters from the entire franchise. I’m not even certain which generation this movie is based on. However, I know what made the series’ work, and thus, I reside in the section of the audience who grew up with the originals. In addition, I understand the main concern people had with the movie ever since the freaking costumes were released: “Is it going to take itself too seriously?” The charm of this franchise comes from the corniness and lighthearted tone. To turn that into an obnoxiously serious, brooding drama would result in… Batman v Superman (and we all know how well that one turned out). To make things perfectly clear, being “dark” is not the problem, poor screenwriting is. How can The Dark Knight be universally praised for its dark tone and adult themes while Batman v Superman is despised for its somber style and gloomy character arcs? Aside from the fact that Christopher Nolan is an angel from cinema heaven; The Dark Knight developed its characters and didn’t spend half the dialogue setting up future installments. In the case of Power Rangers, it’s definitely darker than the shows, but they balance it out with plenty of humorous moments. Unfortunately, the movie isn’t very good at comedy, or action, or pacing, or…
Despite these young actors trying their hardest, the material they’re given is garbage. I made the comparison to Chronicle because Power Rangers follows its first act to a T. These characters are extremely clichéd high school stereotypes. Subsequently, we get to see all the gloriously overdone character arcs and easy-to-write backstories that come with them. I’m not going to pretend that the shows had mind-blowing characters, but they had plenty of charm. These guys literally spell out what their main character trait is “I’m insane!” “What’s up crazy girl?” “The ‘golden boy’ of our little town.” It makes for some extremely unengaging characters. I’ll admit, there is a lot of time dedicated to character development, but what we get is not very original. It doesn’t help that 80% of the dialogue is painfully bland exposition.
Despite the character faults, the action could make up for it. Ughhhhhh; that’s where the other half of the problems lie. While the F/X and costumes are decent, it takes forever for us to actually see the Power Rangers! You have to sit through 90 slow minutes of boring high school ridiculousness before any cool stuff happens. Also, the pacing is yawn-inducing, and the camerawork is crappy (ugly Dutch angles, shaky cam, the usual). What’s especially aggravating is the third act. More clichés are abused! We get a fake out death (it’s not a spoiler because you know the movie won’t actually do it), followed by one of the worst examples of “Talking Killer Syndrome” (a term crated by Roger Ebert to describe bad guys who monologue instead of kill), and a very disappointing climax. The fight choreography is ok and the scale is fun, but the battle sequence ached for more time devoted to it. Hopefully the sequels are more action-drewn, but this movie never measures up to the potential. Honestly, it would have been outstanding if it was directed by Edgar Wright. The source material would be perfect for his style of humor. He can do action quite well (Scott Pilgrim, Hot Fuzz), and the genre lends its way for clever satire. Sadly, I ain’t that lucky. With that, the review is over.
Is Power Rangers an unnecessary adaptation that’s worth your time (like Warcraft or 2016’s The Magnificent Seven)? Or is it an unnecessary adaptation that you should burn with hellfire (Maleficent, 2016’s Ghostbusters, Assassins Creed, 2015’s Vacation, etc.)? That is entirely up to you. In my (packed) theater, the parents looked bored, but the kids were having a blast. Most critics don’t like the film, but most audiences enjoyed it. As for me, there was not enough cool stuff to overshadow the blandness. Then again, I did sit though Monster Trucks and Life (2017) so a film about angsty teens talking to Bryan Cranston’s wall-face doesn’t seem too bad. Power Rangers gets Guy’s Guru Grade of a C+.