The Circle is directed by James Ponsoldt and written by James Ponsoldt and Dave Eggers. Stars-Emma Watson, Tom Hanks, John Boyega, and Bill Paxton. Premise-A woman snags a job at the biggest company in the world (the Circle). No sooner has one week passed and she can tell something is amiss about the bucolic establishment and its agendas.
Wow is this movie a backfire! Not a misfire, a great-aim-but-blows-up-in-your-face backfire. I may fly off the handle later in the review, but considering how serious the movie is taking itself, I’d say it is warranted. The themes and issues the film talks about are very important, and the treatment they give it is nothing short of botched. Let’s start with the presentation.
Try as the filmmakers might, they cannot achieve the level of suspense created by other films of the “sinister corporation investigated with a twenty-something intellect as the lead” genre. While I could point out every single comparison to The Social Network (like the electronica score and a socially awkward young intellectual getting into a prestigious corporation), that would be too easy, instead, I’ll go over how The Circle (wow that’s a boring title) fails on its own merits.
To start, the performances are quite lackluster. With the exception of Bill Paxton who plays Watson’s dad (who has multiple sclerosis) and does the part with sympathy, charm, and good humor, everyone is collecting a paycheck. Watson is bland, Hanks is barley in the movie, and the supporting cast is extremely awkward. Most of the movie follows the infamous “tell don’t show” style of filmmaking; that is, all exposition, no action. Unfortunately, the film has no idea how to maintain, or create for that matter, suspense and the result is a painfully slow 110 minutes of bland characters talking. This is only a fraction of The Circle’s failures. The real badness lies in the message.
*Before I continue, let it be known that any plot points I bring up are in the trailers* Basically, the entire goal of the Circle is to have universally access to everything happening at all times with everybody. This is achieved via tiny cameras placed anywhere and everywhere. There would be no more secrets, and the word “private” would be nonexistent. Yeah, if your initial emotion is fear, then your second is confusion. The biggest problem with this movie is how unbelievably unbelievable it is. There could be some business practices that I’m not aware of, but there is no conceivable way that this companie’s plan could be carried out in any form of reality. The film takes itself so dang seriously, but it fails to account for things like: religious/moral beliefs, the law, age, race, social status, and human nature! The nail in the coffin is the fact that we just had a movie about how corporations spying on us are wrong. I think it was based off a famous fugitive… a privileged intellectual who got into a super influential organization… I think it had social commentary as well… oh yeah! It was Snowden in 2016. That same year, Jason Bourne and Now You See Me 2 used that message as a subplot. Answer me this, if this message has been universally written about and discussed (it’s still a hot-button topic today), how can so many people buy into the Circle’s idea of no personal freedom or privacy? It’s based on a book. Well, then the screenwriter should have adjusted for what changed in the world (as the novel was published in 2013), or *GASP* write an original movie! I already have a premise, set the film after the plan for world transparency has been enforced, and go from there. At the very least it would be something we’ve never seen before.
This script came from the back alleys of Tumblr, I just know it. Not only can you predict every twist and turn of this plot, but the social commentary is extremely propagandized and over-the-top. Instead of subtle storytelling and detailed exposition scenes, we get one-sided fallacies posing as intellectual arguments. What makes it even worse is how PC the movie is. I stated that this movie (whose only non-white main character has all of 5 minutes on-screen) ignores variables like race, laws, and whatnot. Well, it’s also very ethnocentric. I can imagine showing this movie to different cultures around the world and seeing them look at it with confused/unconcerned expressions. I wouldn’t care so much about this if the movie didn’t constantly act like, “This could really happen! Be scared!” Obviously, our world ain’t perfect, and technology has been abused by many to gain access to other people’s information. However, The Circle seems to forget, the generation it’s aiming for distrusts big businesses almost as much as the government. What makes it worse is that the characters are too bland to be relatable. Watson’s character can’t seem to decide if she’s for or against the Circle. Her character arc is extremely rushed, most of the supporting cast is simply forgotten about, and the ending fails to conclude each character’s story. Oy, what a mess.
The most you’ll get out of this movie is a reminder to keep your computer’s security system up-to-date; and a bit of contempt for the careers of everyone involved with the film. Except for Paxton of course; that man couldn’t give a bad performance if he tried. The Circle gets Guy’s Guru Grade of a D.
Ok, so where the heck have I been? In short, I finished my final exams and the Top Ten Best Study Soundtracks list in the same week and it left me completely drained. It took me some time to acknowledge it, but I needed a rest. Not helping was trying to write this review in my exhausted state. I scrapped at least 3 drafts of this review because I couldn’t get enough energy to complete it; the results were unsatisfying. To remedy this, I took last week off. Now I’m back to work and ready for action. There is much more going on in my life, but that will have to wait for another post. Also, I will get to reviewing Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 as soon as I can.